Search This Blog
About This Blog
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
Comments on blog posts do not represent official NRC communication, and links to internet sites other than the NRC website do not constitute the agency’s endorsement of that site’s content, policies or products. Please read our Disclaimer for more information.
Quiz to NRC Region IV AIT Team from one of the disciples of NRC Branch Chief gifted with MIT Intelligence, Intution and Sixth Sense: SONGS Unit 2 RSGs suffered moderate damage compared with severe damage suffered by Unit 3 RSGs. Has NRC asked SONGS Engineers and SMs whey were they operating unit 3 at lower secondary pressures and higher reactor thermal power levels compared with Unit 2 RSGs. What drove them to this change, Did they seek Operations management approval. Did they understood the implication of this change. Was the change made using ‘critical questioning and investigative attitude’ and conservative decision making process. Do they understand now what went wrong and what they did wrong. Mr. Elmo Collins, Best of luck, the answers to these questions will HELP ALL and save Public from Getting Hurt!
No technology can predict the mood of natural forces. Devastaing combination of Hurricanes, Earthquakes, Tsunamis and a MSLB can create Havoc with Peoples Lives, Depressed Economy, Crops and Delicate Eco-Systems by restarting Degraded SONGS Unit 2 as an Unapproved Experiment like Chernobyl. Are NRC, SCE, MHI, Westinghouse, AREVA, USA, NEI and NEIL willing to post a CASH Bond of $12 Billion to cover these damages to begin with.